What is Balanced
Reading?

Policies

Contact Us



Developing Research-Based Resources for the Balanced Reading Teacher



 

Abecedarian 
Reading 
Assessment 
here


Return to the
BalancedReading.com Home Page







 

 

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Sebastian Wren, Ph.D.

Since 1971, the National Center for Education Statistics has been tracking assessment data in the areas of Math, Science, and Reading -- this assessment is called the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP), and it has come to be known as the "Nation's Report Card."

In reading, scores have been tracked from a nationwide sample of 9, 13, and 17 year olds since 1971.  A summary of the reading scores for the NAEP is presented below:
 
 

From the National Center for Education Statistics

Scores on the NAEP have not changed dramatically in over 30 years.  As the great debate has raged, we have moved through periods of Phonics instruction and Whole Language instruction, and even periods of Balanced Reading instruction.  Still the scores have remained stable.

What's worse, the reading scores are not good.  Consider this summary of the 1998 NAEP scores:
 

 
 
Age
Percent Below Basic
Percent Basic
Percent Proficient
Percent Advanced
Age 9 (grade 4)
38
24
24
7
Age 13 (grade 8)
26
38
30
3
Age 17 (grade 12)
23
31
34
6


What this summary table says is that most students have only rudimentary reading skills, while only a very few students have proficient or advanced reading skills.

And it has been that way for as long as we have been testing reading skills.

The moral of this story is that the "Great Debate" (or what some have described as the "Reading Wars") is really a pointless debate.  With the focus on instructional techniques, we have lost sight of student learning.  We are concerned more with what the teacher does than what the student needs to learn.  If we are to be truly successful at teaching all children to read (and there is no reason why we shouldn't be), we must shift our attention away from the pointless polemics of the Great Debate, and focus instead upon student learning needs.

Only when we shift our focus to the individual learning needs of individual students will we be able to teach all children to read.  Research has shown that there are basic knowledge domains that must be well developed in all early readers if they are to be successful.  No matter what instructional approach the teacher uses, all children must learn and master the same knowledge domains.  What all teachers must understand, then, is what these knowledge domains are, and how they can assess them and teach them as effectively as possible.

Fortunately, this is an area where research can offer a great deal of information.

The Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, for example, has summarized the most important findings of the past 30 years of reading research and presented it in a readable document that teachers have found to be quite helpful in understanding what the essential areas related to successful reading acquisition are, and how they relate to each other.  Beginning with an understanding of the "framework" presented in that document will help teachers understand and make use of such valuable resources as "Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning About Print" by Marilyn Jager Adams, "Classrooms that Work" by Dick Allington and Pat Cunningham, and Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children by the National Research Council.  Go to http://www.sedl.org/reading/framework and browse around the on-line, interactive version of the framework.  You can also download a PDF version to read and share with other people.

We have also begun to collect information that can help teachers to be more effective in their instruction as well (see "I is for Instruction").  And we have collected a good deal of information and resources related to diagnostic reading assessment (see "A is for Assessment")

If we do not dramatically change the way we think about reading instruction, and break out of the repetitive cycle of the Great Debate, then children are doomed to the mediocre reading achievement levels we have seen for the past 30 years.  And that is totally unacceptable (see "C is for Consequences for Reading Failure").




BalancedReading.com  •  P. O. Box 300471  •  Austin, TX  78703

Do you have comments or questions about this site?

Would you like to contribute material or information to this site?

Contact Us.

Last Updated 8-7-03